Quantcast
FREE MUSIC NEWSLETTERS
 In Tune


CCM Magazine.com - Christ Community Music
ALL MOVIES
X

Page   1  2  3  4  5  >

  • "Year One" Mashes Up Creation, Covenant and Cain and Abel
    (June 2009)
    Christian Hamaker
    Year One is not the story of Adam and Eve but of Zed and Oh (Jack Black and Michael Cera, respectively),...
  • Love Doesn't Give up in "Goodbye Solo"
    (June 2009)
    John Sizemore
    Ramin Bahrani’s Goodbye Solo is a simple tale, quietly told, and one of the best films you’ll...
  • "Imagine That" ... Murphy Makes an Enjoyable Family Film
    (June 2009)
    Christa Banister
    Eddie Murphy’s previous efforts in family films have left a lot to be desired: stories really worth...
  • Sub-Par Sub Car Drama in "Taking of Pelham 1 2 3"
    (June 2009)
    Christian Hamaker
    The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3, a remake of a 1974 film that starred Walter Matthau and Robert Shaw,...
  • "Food, Inc." Gives New Meaning to Watching What We Eat
    (June 2009)
    Christa Banister
    Many squeamish moments aside, Food, Inc. is still a great example of informative, compelling filmmaking,...
  • "Land of the Lost" Should've Stayed Lost
    (June 2009)
    Christa Banister
    Unlike the smart writing and savvy direction of Star Trek, Land of the Lost only has Will...
  • "The Hangover" Hits Bottom for Laughs
    (June 2009)
    Christian Hamaker
    The Hangover continues the trend toward outrageous, raunchy R-rated comedies. That domain, dominated...

Page   1  2  3  4  5  >

Better Luck Next Time for Iron Man
AVERAGE RATING
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Better Luck Next Time for Iron Man
Christian Hamaker
Crosswalk.com Contributing Writer
(May 2008)

DVD Release Date:  September 30, 2008

Theatrical Release Date:  May 2, 2008

Rating:  PG-13 (for some intense sequences of sci-fi action and violence, and brief suggestive content)

Genre:  Action-Adventure/Science Fiction

Run Time:  126 min.

Director:  Jon Favreau

Actors:  Robert Downey Jr., Jeff Bridges, Gwyneth Paltrow, Terrence Howard, Leslie Bibb, Shaun Toub, Faran Tahir

The whoops and hollers that greeted the introduction of the title character of Iron Man, the latest Marvel Comics character to make it to the big screen, during a preview screening of the film indicate that the flesh-and-blood actors who portray the characters are merely a sideshow for the Main Event.

Advertisement

The audience’s squeals upon the first full look at Iron Man, well into the film’s running time, were a resounding signal as to what the audience had come to see—not Robert Downey Jr. as Tony Stark, who builds the suit that turns him into Iron Man; not a bald, bearded Jeff Bridges as Stark’s business partner and the story’s villain; and not Gwyneth Paltrow as Starks’ loyal assistant. No, this man of steel—“titanium alloy” Stark specifies—is the star of the show, a mechanical, emotionless hulk that metes out justice upon the story’s bad guys.

We’ve seen this sort of robotic action hero before. Think of Peter Weller, who became Robocop, although Iron Man has a higher purpose than mere vigilantism. He’s a weapons manufacturer whose awakened conscience leads him to question his company’s mission and to take on rogue elements abroad.

Possibly the start of a film franchise, Iron Man shows some promise but is held back by retrograde attitudes about male/female relationships, some pacing problems, and a story that relies on special effects that don’t come across as all that special.

Stark, christened the “merchant of death” by his adversaries, heads Stark Industries with partner Obadiah Stane (Bridges), but his technical genius is matched by an oversized appetite for women and liquor. (Stark succumbs to alcoholism in the Iron Man comic books, but this early film installment only winks at his boozing.) He flirts outrageously with women, has his own entourage of pole dancers on his private jet, and responds to a feisty reporter’s questions by propositioning her. (The two are shown wrestling each other’s clothes off in bed in the very next scene.) These attitudes toward gender roles are more befitting the era of Iron Man’s debut—1963—than new-millennium ideas of equality of the sexes, but the film’s retro views are front-loaded and easy to overlook in the buildup to the story’s main event:  the unleashing of Iron Man.

Content Provided by: http://www.crosswalk.com

Page   1  2

COMMENTS
  • Sjplwc 10/10/2008 10:07 PM
    Obviously, my post below should have begun; "I couldn't DIS-agree more with this review". Sorry, it's kind of late; I'm tired; didn't bother to check for typos.
  • Sjplwc 10/10/2008 10:04 PM
    I couldn't agree more with this review. Iron Man was, arguably, the finest installment of any of the Marvel Comics movies. (I offer this opinion as a middle aged guy who was pretty much obsessed with the Marvel Universe -- including Iron Man -- for most of his teen years).

    Downey, jr.! Delightful in the role of Tony Stark. His role was humourous,yet oddly heart breaking. The relationship with Pepper Potts (Paltrow) was handledpitch-perfect.

    The flick's first reel involving the caves, the terrorists and Mr. Stark's inventiveness was riveting. His last talk with an unexpected Muslim friend put a lump in my throat, and ensuing "conversion" of the womanizing industrialist was actually unexpectedly affecting.

    I would have liked a super villain who was a bit more developed, but even there I was only mildly disappointed.

    Every one I know who saw Iron Man loved it. I have to say the reviewer here is in the minority. And rightly so.
  • kingtoruk 5/4/2008 9:36 AM
    Director Favreau finds in Downey an actor capable of conveying the complexities of an alcoholic whose womanizing and abuse of wealth ultimately takes a rear seat to an awakened sense of personal responsibility. The plot plunges him into a hell he's taken part in perpetuating, and a near death experience that leaves him with a sense of purpose that puts his talents to righteous use and overrides his previous hedonistic proclivities.
    Whereas the depiction of Stark's shameless character flaws are neccisarily exhibited and to the point in presentation, they illustrate his character development, and are niether glorified, nor gratuitously exaggerated. That his Iron Man persona ultimately comes across stiff and remorseless owes more to Iron Man's comic-book origins, the function of the character's intentional anonymity when in the armor, and it's physical contribution to Stark's affectation of inhuman mannerisms to dishearten his enemies. It's the way the character was written.

Page   1  2  

  • CCMmagazine.com (Salem All-Pass) registration.
    With your free membership, you will be able to add your reviews to alums, comment on articles, and more! Join today.
    Salem Forums Users: You do not need to register for a new account; your forums account is part of the "Salem All-Pass."
    Required fields marked with *
    *Username:
    *Password:
    *Confirm Password:
    *E-mail Address:
    FREE NEWSLETTERS
    Terms of Use / Privacy Policy
Rewards Zone
STAFF BLOGVIEW MORE
  • CCM Blogs
    New Digital Issue is Live!
    Check out our new digital issue featuring Leeland.
SITE SPOTLIGHTS
CCM magazine.com - Christ Community Music
CCMmagazine.com is a proud member of the Salem Publishing family of sites providing content and resources such as :
& the Salem Communications family of sites including: